Conclusions and Positions
Tentative Conclusions and Positions arising from Out of the Wild Project research.
In this module we will present project research conclusions and proposed general public policy positions. By "general" we are referring to public policy positions that might be viewed as national or international in scope as opposed to those that might be limited in relevance to a specific municipality, town, or community.
The Out of the Wild Project focuses specifically on attitudes and opinions about the wholesale corruption of the American government and American institutions. Of course, such an inquiry presumes that such corruption exists while exploring opinions about its existence. At the same time, our research has investigated allegations of corruption and related evidence in varying degrees. The proper assessment of attitudes and opinions about corruption necessarily includes, in our view, an inquiry into the legitimacy of those attitudes and opinions, which, in turn, necessitates an inquiry into evidence of actual corruption.
From such an inquiry, we have arrived at our own conclusions and public policy recommendations. While we are at liberty to share our conclusions and public policy recommendations, we are not at liberty to share all of the evidence of corruption we have reviewed. Confidential sources and methods are at stake.
Naturally, we anticipate that not everyone will share the same conclusions about corruption, even where they may be privy to the same evidence. Certainly, not everyone will share the same conclusions where they do not have access to the same evidence. Such are the realities of this social arena. Obviously, you are welcome to take our conclusions and recommendations seriously, or not, on the basis of your own knowledge or suppositions about the subject matter.
We are not a public agency nor are we journalists providing a service for public consumption. We are a private foundation. We are not obliged to make full disclosure of any of our research nor are we obliged to defend any of our conclusions or recommendations with evidence of their appropriateness. You are welcome to form your own opinions and positions on the basis of your own criteria.
2 Pages - Click to Proceed
first page >>
Tentative Conclusions and Positions arising from Out of the Wild Project research.
In this module we will present project research conclusions and proposed general public policy positions. By "general" we are referring to public policy positions that might be viewed as national or international in scope as opposed to those that might be limited in relevance to a specific municipality, town, or community.
The Out of the Wild Project focuses specifically on attitudes and opinions about the wholesale corruption of the American government and American institutions. Of course, such an inquiry presumes that such corruption exists while exploring opinions about its existence. At the same time, our research has investigated allegations of corruption and related evidence in varying degrees. The proper assessment of attitudes and opinions about corruption necessarily includes, in our view, an inquiry into the legitimacy of those attitudes and opinions, which, in turn, necessitates an inquiry into evidence of actual corruption.
From such an inquiry, we have arrived at our own conclusions and public policy recommendations. While we are at liberty to share our conclusions and public policy recommendations, we are not at liberty to share all of the evidence of corruption we have reviewed. Confidential sources and methods are at stake.
Naturally, we anticipate that not everyone will share the same conclusions about corruption, even where they may be privy to the same evidence. Certainly, not everyone will share the same conclusions where they do not have access to the same evidence. Such are the realities of this social arena. Obviously, you are welcome to take our conclusions and recommendations seriously, or not, on the basis of your own knowledge or suppositions about the subject matter.
We are not a public agency nor are we journalists providing a service for public consumption. We are a private foundation. We are not obliged to make full disclosure of any of our research nor are we obliged to defend any of our conclusions or recommendations with evidence of their appropriateness. You are welcome to form your own opinions and positions on the basis of your own criteria.
2 Pages - Click to Proceed
first page >>
The Businss of America...
... is no longer "liberty and justice for all"
Kill the Messenger
Two-time Academy Award nominee Jeremy Renner (“The Bourne Legacy”) leads an all-star cast in a dramatic thriller based on the remarkable true story of Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Gary Webb.
Webb stumbles onto a story which leads to the shady origins of the men who started the crack epidemic on the nation’s streets…and further alleges that the CIA was involved in smuggling cocaine into the U.S., and using the profits to arm rebels fighting in Nicaragua.
Rebellion to Tyrants...
...is Obedience to God
- Oliver Cromwell
The greatest obstacle to the American dream
for most Americans has been the blinding conceit and self serving public policies of the illegitimate controlling elite (ICE) and the notions of their own entitlement as stewards of a false "greater good".
Draining the swamp is long overdue.
This distopian fiction published in 1949 is widely believed to be a frighteningly accurate description of the Orwellian state of American society and culture today
a critical examination of the most destructive species on earth and the paths of desolation left in its wake
Sir, No Sir
a profoundly relevant documentary featuring courageous resistance to the shameful insanity of times past
Home | General Survey | Community Pages and Survey | Video Channels | About Us | Home | Contact Us | Copyright (c) 2009-2023
Home | General Survey | Community Pages and Survey | Video Channels | About Us | Home | Contact Us | Copyright (c) 2009-2023